Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Añadir filtros

Tópicos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año
1.
Vaccine ; 41(18): 3003-3010, 2023 05 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2296670

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Here, we systematically assessed the safety and immunogenicity of the heterologous ChAd/BNT vaccination regimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the immunogenicity by the geometric mean titers ratio (GMTR) of the neutralizing antibody and anti-spike IgG. The safety of heterologous ChAd/BNT vaccination was evaluated using the pooled risk ratios (RRs) calculated by the random-effects model about the adverse events. Our study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021265165. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included in the analyses. Compared to the homologous ChAd/ChAd vaccination, the heterologous ChAd/BNT vaccination showed significantly higher immunogenicity in terms of the neutralizing antibody and GMTR of anti-spike IgG, but at the same time displayed higher incidence of total adverse reactions, especially for the local adverse reactions. Moreover, heterologous ChAd/BNT vaccination showed similar immunogenicity to the homologous BNT/BNT vaccination (GMTR of neutralizing antibody and anti-spike IgG) and similar safety. DISCUSSION: Heterologous ChAd/BNT vaccination showed robust immunogenicity and tolerable safety.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna BNT162 , COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Inmunoglobulina G , Anticuerpos Antivirales
2.
Vaccine ; 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-2263396

RESUMEN

Introduction Here, we systematically assessed the safety and immunogenicity of the heterologous ChAd/BNT vaccination regimens. Materials and Methods We evaluated the immunogenicity by the geometric mean titers ratio (GMTR) of the neutralizing antibody and anti-spike IgG. The safety of heterologous ChAd/BNT vaccination was evaluated using the pooled risk ratios (RRs) calculated by the random-effects model about the adverse events. Our study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021265165. Results Eleven studies were included in the analyses. Compared to the homologous ChAd/ChAd vaccination, the heterologous ChAd/BNT vaccination showed significantly higher immunogenicity in terms of the neutralizing antibody and GMTR of anti-spike IgG, but at the same time displayed higher incidence of total adverse reactions, especially for the local adverse reactions. Moreover, heterologous ChAd/BNT vaccination showed similar immunogenicity to the homologous BNT/BNT vaccination (GMTR of neutralizing antibody and anti-spike IgG) and similar safety. Discussion Heterologous ChAd/BNT vaccination showed robust immunogenicity and tolerable safety. Running title: heterologous COVID-19 vaccination outcomes

3.
Curr Oncol ; 29(11): 8917-8936, 2022 Nov 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2116235

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The novel coronavirus that has triggered the present COVID-19 pandemic continues to spread globally, resulting in widespread morbidity and mortality. Patients with cancer remain one of the most vulnerable subsets of the population to the disease. This study examined the effects of the pandemic on cancer patients' treatment, psychology, knowledge, attitudes, and practices. METHODS: A survey was emailed to 9861 patients at a cancer centre in Toronto, Canada. Descriptive results were summarized. Qualitative feedback was coded and summarized. Regression modelling was used to explore factors associated with patient psychological well-being, knowledge, attitudes, and practices. RESULTS: A total of 1760 surveys were completed, with a response rate of 17.8%. Most participants did not experience any pandemic-related treatment delays, and vaccination rates were high. Participants who identified themselves as non-white (OR 3.30, CI: 1.30-5.30; p ≤ 0.001), and those who referred to journal articles for information (p = 0.002) reported higher psychological impact scores. There were no significant predictors of whether participants would use personal protective equipment when leaving their homes or whether they would go to crowded places. DISCUSSION: This study provides another snapshot of cancer patients perceptions and needs during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias , Humanos , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiología , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , SARS-CoV-2 , Neoplasias/terapia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA